Showing posts with label badminton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label badminton. Show all posts

Saturday, August 18, 2012

Recreations in Who's Who


These days most people either do not have enough imagination or spare time or superabundant creativity to list recreations in their entries for Who’s Who that stray far beyond walking, reading, tennis, or golf—if they bother to list them at all. Others indulge that irritating habit of using their entries as an opportunity to insert a tedious little joke. Naturally in both respects, as in all others, the Edwardians tease and delight us by going much further in the same directions. In his “The Recreations of Distinguished people” (Temple Bar, 127:507, February 1903, pp. 208–16), Charles I. Graham selected from the 1902 edition what he then regarded as some of “the most interesting pieces of information afforded by this most interesting book”:
Dr. T. L. Cuyler, for instance, states that “fifty-two years of active life in such perfect health have been his as to need no recreations”; yet, he adds, “except walking, and entertainment-reading, and talk”—a liberal exception after all. Mr. Nicholas D. Davis, auditor-general of British Guiana, tells us that “he knocks off work to carry bricks”…and that his peculiar form of recreation also consists in “historical researches relating to English colonization in America.” This is something like the answer given by William Montgomery Crook, editor of the Echo, who looks on “politics” as part of his recreation. It is indeed difficult to conceive how men’s recreations can, in any true sense, lie so close to their daily work. Of course, if a man has changed his calling as life goes on we can understand how his recreation may consist in resuming somewhat of his earlier tasks, as when Dr. J. B. Crozier, now philosopher and historian, tells us that his recreations are “skating, boxing, dog-fancying, swimming, walking, and attending the practice of the special hospitals.”…
            It is not always the really greatest who indulge in peculiar forms of recreation. Neither [Field Marshal] Lord Roberts [of Kandahar] nor [Lieutenant-General] Lord Kitchener [of Khartoum] is eccentric when at play. Lord Roberts simply states that he hunts and bicycles; Lord Kitchener apparently ignores the question. It does not need a reference to Who’s Who to inform us that the present prime minister’s recreation is golf [the Right Hon. Arthur Balfour, M.P.], nor that of the late prime minister (Lord Salisbury) natural science…
            But to come to some of the more extraordinary answers given to this question, What is your recreation? Surely a man must have no recreation proper who tells us, as Lieutenant-General J. W. Laurie, D.C.L. and M.P., does, that he finds it thus: “Member of Governing Body of City and Guilds Institutes; agriculture, breeder of thorough-bred stock, and personal supervision of an experimental farm; also of children settled in Canada from Mrs. Birt’s Home at Liverpool.” Side by side with which we may place, “maker and patentee of the Sleepy Hollow chair,” which the Dean of Ely (Dr. Stubbs) mentions as his form of recreation.
Graham continues at length in this vein, but I must say that my favorites are the following, quoted in no particular order:

Mr. G. R. Sims: “Battledore and shuttlecock,” pointedly not Badminton.

The Reverend E. J. Hardy, chaplain to H.M. Forces, “Riding his horse ‘Baby,’ or her assistant, Curate, as he calls his bicycle; talking to soldiers; taking a sunbath; thinking of the queer things of life; swimming, golf.”

H.S.H. The Duke of Teck, brother of the Princess of Wales, the future Queen Mary: “A little of all.”

Mr. Charles Williams, senior military correspondent of the Daily Chronicle: “Ritual.”

Mrs. Crawford, Paris correspondent of the Daily News: “Moon- and star-gazing when resting on oars in the country; was in youth devoted to reading, chess-playing, and pictorial art; likes now a quiet rubber of whist; hardly ever knows what tedium is; is a constantly interested observer of animated nature; has found real life so interesting that novels and plays seem flat; roughed it in the [Franco-Prussian] war of 1870, and during the Commune, and feels thankful for the education thus acquired.”

William Hall, V.C., R.N., farmer of Nova Scotia: “Shooting crows.”

Sir Henry Irving, actor: “Acting.”

Lord Baden-Powell: “Pig-sticking (winner of Kadir Cup), polo, big game shooting, hunting, yachting, stage-managing, acting, and singing, painting, etching.”

The Countess of Galloway: “The musical drama of Bayreuth at Bayreuth.”

The Most Reverend Richard Whately, Church of Ireland Archbishop of Dublin: “The boomerang.”

Madame Janotha, court pianiste to H.I.M. the German Emperor: “Visiting the chapel of our Blessed Lady at Czestochowa [her place of birth in Poland]. Playing the organ, reading great works, mountaineering, taking care care of White Heather (the black cat).”

George Chetwynd Griffith: “Loafing and traveling; has been five times and a half round the world; once across the Rockies, thrice over the Andes (treasures a pipe smoked at 19,300 feet above sea-level), three times round the Horn, once in the Antarctic ice; has also flown in a balloon from London to the field of Agincourt; at present wandering through Australasia and Oceania to see how they look twenty years after.”
 
Emily Soldene, singer, actress, director, theater manager, novelist, and journalist: “An ocean voyage, plain sewing, and building castles in Spain.”

Dame Clara Butt, contralto: “Signing autographs and photographs.”

The Reverend Canon William Benham: “Riding on the knife-boards of omnibuses.”

Dr. Paul Mantegazza: “Je me suis marié à 25 ans à Salta dans la République Argentine avec une jeune demoiselle de haute famille et j’en ai eu cinq enfants, et une seconde fois à 60 ans avec une jeune comtesse de Florence et j’en ai une petite fille qui a maintenant sept ans.”

Colonel William Carey, C.B.: “Reconnoitering country with a view to military maneuvers in peace and war; study of scripture as literally carried out in the present day in its political aspects; deep sea diving.”

Badminton

According to last week’s Spectator, the game of Badminton is “the pâté de foie gras of Olympic sports.” That was before the game-throwing scandal was exposed in London, and those Chinese, Korean, and Indonesian players disqualified. If the delicate, cork-and-goose-feather shuttlecock once floated back and forth over nets suspended in arbors, conservatories or on wide verandahs, affording much enjoyment to her ladyship, the colonel, and their guests, it is now propelled with grim menace by pairs of muscularly perspiring Amazons either locked in mortal combat, or else prepared clumsily to dump a match. The idea of disqualification for fraudulent conduct in the game of Badminton would surely have struck Victorian ladies and gentlemen as the height of improbability, but there it is. However, I am concerned here with the origins of the game. The Spectator goes on to state that Badminton was “invented in India by the British army, and brought back to Blighty in 1873 at a party given by the Duke of Beaufort at his country estate, hence the name.” Something about this struck an inauthentic note, so I checked. Sure enough, this claim is squarely contradicted by the Oxford English Dictionary in the article on badminton, n., and in suspiciously proximate language: “A popular tradition about the origins of the modern game, according to which it is said to have been developed by British army officers in India, and to have been so named after a version of the game which was played at Badminton House in 1873 by officers on leave, is not borne out by the evidence, although versions of the game were popular among the British in India by 1873.” (Unambiguous citations of shuttlecock, n., meanwhile, extend helpfully all the way back to the sixteenth century.) According to the Academy (226, September 2, 1876, p. 233), “Shuttlecock tennis [also known as battledore and shuttlecock] was probably played in some form or other in many private houses long before it received the meaningless or misleading name of “Badminton,” but if we go back two centuries or so we find it played also sometimes in tennis courts; so that this, as well as the ball-out-door-game [of tennis], is a revival, not an invention.” For some reason the issue must have been topical in September 1876, because according to the unsigned article “Varieties” that appeared a few weeks later in The Leisure Hour (1135, September 27, 1873, p. 624), “the game of battledore and shuttlecock is becoming popular in certain high circles of society, where it is known as ‘Badminton.’” Battledore and shuttlecock was certainly commonplace in England by 1852, when the following brief notice about a book for young people entitled The Heiress in her Minority [apparently a work by the notable political economist Jane Marcet] appeared in the Athenaeum (1266, January 31, 1852, p. 150):
On the whole, the book is a small, readable, compressed cyclopaedia, with a copious index and distinct chapter headings—a very mine for youth, and a happy anodyne for the restless hours of a wet day in a country house, when “bat and ball” are forbidden, the skipping-rope is laid aside, and les graces, battledore and shuttlecock, archery, and other amusements of the same genus are impossible.
However, the name badminton was certainly in use by 1863, though apparently not yet so widespread as to remove the need for explanation, because in December of that year an article entitled “Life in a Country House” (The Cornhill Magazine, 8:48, p. 711) stated:
After lunch, everybody is expected to hold themselves at the disposal of the lady of the house, for a ride, drive, or walk, as the case may be. If the weather be such as to induce you to remain within doors, your co-operation will be sought for a game at pool, badminton (which is battledore and shuttlecock played with sides, across a string suspended some five feet from the ground), and similar amusements.
Be that as it may, one of the more depressing things about Olympic sports is that they are in nature obviously about as distant from “amusements” as it is possible to be, so one wonders how corruption in Badminton will ever be eliminated. I daresay a Badminton doping scandal is not an inconceivable prospect.